Skip to main content
Institute for Legislative Analysis logo
Stacey Plaskett — Democratic U.S. Representative for Congress (official headshot)

Stacey Plaskett Voting Record & Scorecard | Institute for Legislative Analysis

US Representative from US

District: At-Large • Democrat

2025 Alignment:

N/A

View Member History
District Performance
Cook PVI Rating: (N/A)
District Estimate: N/A
District Performance: N/A (N/A)
District Based Rating:
View All District
Rankings of Congress

2025 Ratings by Policy Category

Click Icon to Filter Table

Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-US-At-Large) is tracked on the Institute for Legislative Analysis legislative scorecard. Highest category scores: Local and National Security (50%), Energy and Environment (10%), and Tax and Fiscal (0%). Stacey Plaskett represents Congress's At-Large Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Title

Lawmaker Position

H.R. 2483 (Pettersen Amdt. 25)House 2025-20261x

Codifying Medicaid Waiver Budget Gimmicks that Weaken Budget Neutrality and Enable Bigger Federal Spending

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-CO) amendment #3 to the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025 would codify guidance directing that Medicaid Section 1115 waiver "budget neutrality" determinations take into account claimed downstream savings. This approach can allow waiver proposals to appear "cost neutral" on paper by crediting speculative or indirect savings, even when the waiver expands spending in the Medicaid program itself. Locking this methodology into law would make it harder for future administrations and Congress to restore stricter budget-neutrality standards and could accelerate waiver-driven expansion of Medicaid benefits and federal obligations. According to opponents, the amendment weakens a key taxpayer safeguard, invites accounting games, and increases the risk that Medicaid costs will grow while transparency and fiscal accountability decline.
Oppose is the Limited Government Position as budget neutrality should be a real, enforceable guardrail, not a political accounting exercise that unlocks larger entitlements and higher taxpayer exposure. Congress should restrain waiver-driven expansions and insist on transparent, verifiable limits on federal Medicaid spending.
H.R. 3383 (Self Amdt. 123)House 2025-20261x

Preventing New SEC Disclosure Mandates on Dual Class Share Companies.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Keith Self (R-TX) amendment #123 to the "Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation (INVEST) Act of 2025" would strike Section 307. This section would require issuers to disclose the share of ownership and voting power held by directors, director nominees, named executive officers, and 5 percent voting power holders. According to supporters of the amendment, these governance structures are already widely discussed by investors and market analysts, and the amendment is intended to help prevent another federal paperwork regime that increases legal costs, invites enforcement risk, and makes it harder for growing companies to access public markets.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this amendment helps combat regulatory overreach and protects companies from unnecessary legal expenses and compliance costs.
H.R. 3383 (Waters Amdt. 125)House 2025-20261x

Worsening Regulatory Overreach in the Financial Sector by Expanding Mandates on Investment Advisers and Hedge Funds.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) amendment #125 to the "Increasing Investor Opportunities Act" would require investment advisers and hedge funds to conduct know-your-customer verification and implement anti-money laundering procedures for foreign clients. While framed as a transparency and enforcement measure, it would extend a very burdensome new compliance regime into parts of the private investment market that are not currently regulated in this manner. Essentially, much more routine investing activity would now be pushed into a federal monitoring and paperwork structure that is especially costly for smaller firms.
Oppose is the Limited Government Position as this amendment further grows federal regulatory overreach. These new compliance mandates imposed on private markets increase surveillance-style requirements and impose bureaucratic costs without clear limits.
H.R. 3383 (Waters Amdt. 127)House 2025-20261x

Imposing New Price Controls and Government Enforcement Powers over Investment Fees in the Financial Sector.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) amendment #127 to the "Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation (INVEST) Act of 2025" would define and prohibit fees charged by SEC-registered individuals and entities that are not "clearly disclosed" or "proportional" to the services provided. In effect, the measure would grow federal government power into price setting and policing subjective standards for what private-sector financial services may charge, beyond existing disclosure rules.
Oppose is the Limited Government Position as this amendment grows the regulatory power of unaccountable federal bureaucrats and invites de facto price-setting by empowering the SEC to police "proportionality" in private-market fees.
H.R. 3838 (Biggs Amd. 29)House 2025-20261x

Protecting Military Readiness by Blocking Endangered Species Act "Critical Habitat" Designations that Restrict Training and National Defense Operations.

Supports
Limited
Government
The Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) amendment #29 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would prohibit the designation of certain military and National Guard lands as "critical habitat" under the Endangered Species Act when the Department of Defense determines that restriction would interfere with national defense needs. The amendment also would exempt military personnel from certain Endangered Species Act prohibitions during national defense related operations, including incidental harm to protected species. According to supporters, environmental designations and litigation can function as backdoor shutdown tools that limit access to ranges and training areas, weaken readiness, and force commanders to prioritize paperwork and lawsuits over preparedness.
Support is the Limited Government Position as national defense is a core constitutional responsibility and the military should not be hamstrung by regulatory designations that invite lawsuits and restrict training on essential lands. This amendment protects readiness and curbs federal regulatory overreach that can undermine security.
H.R. 3838 (Greene Amd. 91)House 2025-20262x

Stopping Pentagon Mission Creep by Banning Taxpayer-Funded "Lab-Grown Meat" Research and Procurement.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #91 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would ban the Department of Defense from researching, developing, procuring, or promoting cell-cultured meat. The bill is largely in response to the DOD in 2024 using $500 million in taxpayer funds for the development of lab-grown meat products. According to supporters, the Pentagon should not be using defense dollars to experiment with or advance controversial food technologies that belong in the private marketplace. They contended this is a basic guardrail to keep defense spending focused on warfighting needs instead of trendy, politically driven projects.
Support is the Limited Government Position as taxpayers should not be forced to fund nonessential Pentagon experiments that distract from core national defense. The federal government should not use the military as a vehicle to pick winners and losers in emerging commercial industries.
H.R. 3838 (Greene Amd. 93)House 2025-20261x

Ending the Ukraine Blank Check by Prohibiting U.S. Assistance and Refocusing Defense Dollars on America's Core Security Needs.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #94 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would prohibit assistance to Ukraine. According to supporters, Washington has treated Ukraine aid as an open-ended commitment while the federal government racks up debt and neglects urgent needs at home. They contended Congress should stop underwriting another foreign conflict and instead focus U.S. defense policy on deterring direct threats to America and rebuilding readiness.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should end foreign aid commitments that expand America's role overseas without a clear constitutional purpose and without an accountable end point. Prohibiting Ukraine assistance helps restrain spending and reduces the risk of deeper U.S. entanglement abroad.
H.R. 3838 (Greene Amd. 94)House 2025-20261x

Placing America First by Striking Funding for Overseas "Humanitarian" Programs Unrelated to Core National Defense.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #94 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would strike funding for the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid (OHDACA) program. OHDACA is used to support overseas humanitarian and civic assistance activities that often operate alongside broader foreign policy initiatives rather than directly strengthening U.S. military readiness. According to supporters, the Pentagon should focus on deterring adversaries and rebuilding readiness, not serving as a global aid agency, and that taxpayer dollars for national defense should not be diverted into open-ended overseas programs that blur the line between defense and foreign aid.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should rein in non-defense spending and stop using the Pentagon to bankroll activities better left to voluntary charity or to narrowly defined, constitutionally grounded missions. This amendment would have reduced waste and mission creep by keeping defense dollars focused on core national security.
H.R. 3838 (Mace Amd. 14)House 2025-20261x

Strengthening Government Integrity by Preventing Taxpayer Funded Gender Transition Procedures in the Military.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) amendment #14 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to provide gender transition procedures, including surgeries and hormone therapies. According to supporters, this measure keeps the military's health system focused on readiness and medically necessary care rather than controversial, elective interventions driven by political activism.
Support is the Limited Government Position as taxpayer funds should not be utilized to provide elective services surrounding gender reassignment, as is the current case with Botox and other procedures designed to improve physical appearance. All such services and costs should be the responsibility of the individuals seeking to obtain them, not U.S. taxpayers.
H.R. 3838 (Mace Amd. 16)House 2025-20261x

Keeping Military Forms Grounded in Biological Sex Instead of Political Gender Ideology.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) amendment #16 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from soliciting information through a form or survey regarding an individual's gender identity. It would also prohibit providing an option to indicate an individual's sex or gender is something other than male or female. According to supporters, this prevents the military from being drawn into divisive social engineering and keeps official records clear, consistent, and focused on readiness rather than political activism.
Support is the Limited Government Position because the federal government should not use the military to advance ideological agendas or pressure service members to affirm contested concepts. Clear, objective standards help preserve order and keep defense policy focused on the core mission.
H.R. 3838 (McCormick Amd. 96)House 2025-20261x

Blocking Pentagon Recruiting Contracts with Censorship "Fact-Checkers" to Protect Free Speech and Prevent Government-Backed Information Control.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Richard McCormick (R-GA) amendment #96 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would prohibit the Department of Defense from contracting with entities that perform fact-checking and information-grading services when those services are used to censor political opponents. The amendment is in response to the DOD contracting with NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index, entities that are clearly biased against conservatives based on data from the Media Research Center. According to supporters, the federal government should not outsource viewpoint-based policing of speech to outside organizations under the banner of "fact-checking," particularly in ways that can chill lawful debate and manipulate what Americans can see and share.
Support is the Limited Government Position as the federal government should not partner with third-party "fact-checkers" to steer or suppress political speech, directly or indirectly. This amendment restrains government power and helps prevent taxpayer-funded censorship.
H.R. 3838 (Meeks Amd. 34)House 2025-20261x

Reasserting Congressional War Powers by Repealing Outdated Authorizations for Use of Military Force

Supports
Limited
Government
The Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) amendment #34 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would insert the text of H.R. 1488 to repeal the 2002 and 1991 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs). According to supporters, these authorizations are no longer relevant to current threats and have been left on the books for decades after the conflicts they were tied to. They contend that keeping broad, aging AUMFs in place fuels perpetual war footing and allows future military action to be justified without fresh debate and clear limits from Congress. The amendment is intended to ensure the Executive branch consults the people's representatives before expanding U.S. military involvement abroad, as laid out in Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
Support is the Limited Government Position as war-making authority should not rest on open-ended, outdated permissions that concentrate power in the executive branch. Repealing stale AUMFs is a step toward restoring the checks and balances laid out in the U.S. Constitution.
H.R. 3838 (Norman Amd. 13)House 2025-20261x

Stopping Gender Transition Procedures from Being Funded Through Taxpayer Funded Military Family Programs

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) amendment #13 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would prohibit the provision of gender transition procedures, including surgery or medication, through the Exceptional Family Member Program. The amendment would block this program from being used to facilitate or subsidize these elective interventions. According to supporters, this measure keeps military support programs focused on legitimate readiness and family needs rather than political and controversial medical procedures.
Support is the Limited Government Position as taxpayer funds should not be utilized to provide elective services surrounding gender reassignment, as is the current case with Botox and other procedures designed to improve physical appearance. All such services and costs should be the responsibility of the individuals seeking to obtain them, not U.S. taxpayers.
H.R. 3838 (Patronis Amd. 9)House 2025-20262x

Stopping Politicized "Green" Procurement Mandates for the Military's Vehicle Fleet

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-FL) amendment #9 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would strike provisions that establish a preference for Department of Defense motor vehicles using electric or hybrid propulsion systems, along with related requirements. According to supporters, this measure keeps defense procurement focused on mission readiness and operational needs rather than politically driven energy preferences. By removing one size fits all procurement directives, the amendment would allow commanders and acquisition officials to choose the right vehicles for the job without being pushed toward technologies that may not fit every mission, location, or logistics environment.
Support is the Limited Government Position as the federal government should not use the military budget to impose industrial policy or steer markets toward favored technologies. National defense procurement should be politically neutral and driven by readiness, cost, and performance.
H.R. 3838 (Smith Amd. 7)House 2025-20262x

Protecting Military Radar and Readiness from Offshore Wind Interference.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) amendment #7 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would require the Secretary of Defense to certify that offshore wind projects in the North Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic Planning Areas will not interfere with radar capabilities. This proposal would essentially place a defense readiness check on major ocean-based energy projects that can affect training, surveillance, and operational awareness. According to supporters, national security needs should come first, especially considering offshore wind buildouts are largely politically driven and unnecessarily drive-up electricity costs.
Support is the Limited Government Position as providing for the common defense is a core federal responsibility, and the government should not allow federally enabled energy projects to compromise military readiness. This amendment also adds accountability before Washington's preferred energy agenda reshapes critical areas used for defense operations.
H.R. 3838 (Wilson Amd. 81)House 2025-20261x

Protecting Military Installations by Strengthening Penalties for Unlawful Entry

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) amendment #81 to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would increase the maximum penalty in 18 U.S.C. 1382 for unlawfully entering military, naval, or Coast Guard installations or property from six months to two years and clarify the offense as a general intent crime. It would also amend 50 U.S.C. 797 to establish a felony penalty of up to two years for violating security regulations for designated national defense areas, with definitions for covered property and regulations. According to supporters, these changes strengthen deterrence and accountability for unlawful intrusions and violations that can threaten base security, sensitive operations, and the safety of service members.
Support is the Limited Government Position as protecting national defense property is a core federal responsibility, and clearer, enforceable penalties help deter unlawful intrusion without creating a new federal program or bureaucracy.
H.R. 3944 (Carter Amdt. En Bloc No. 2)House 2025-20261x

Reprioritizing Existing Funds Toward Military Readiness and Veterans Care Without Hiking Spending in the Military and VA Appropriation Bill.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. John Carter (R-TX) amendment en bloc No. 2 to the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would package several amendments into one vote and make targeted funding shifts rather than adding new spending. The amendment would transfer $4.1 million out of the NATO Security Investment Fund to the Air Force Planning and Design Fund to bolster base security at installations receiving B-21 bomber aircraft. It would also include multiple "increase and decrease" provisions that redirect existing dollars within VA and military accounts, including $5 million for veterans' medical services with an emphasis on memory care, language encouraging privatized housing options for unaccompanied service members, and provisions to increase access to in-home care through community care. According to supporters, the package strengthens readiness and improves practical care and infrastructure priorities by moving funds away from lower-priority uses and toward core responsibilities, while keeping changes offset so Congress is not opening the door to a broader spending expansion.
Support is the Limited Government Position as it cuts or reduces lower-priority allocations to fund higher-priority needs and relies on offsets and transfers instead of creating new programs or increasing overall spending. Congress should use the power of the purse to focus dollars on essential duties like national defense and veterans' care, not bureaucracy or international slush funds.
H.R. 4016 (Greene Amd. 52)House 2025-20261x

Ending Pentagon Mission Creep by Cutting Overseas Humanitarian and Civic Aid Spending

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #52 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 would strike $117,988,000 for the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid programs. These programs fund certain humanitarian, disaster response, and civic-aid activities conducted by the Department of Defense outside the United States. By removing this funding, the amendment would narrow the Pentagon's role back toward core national defense responsibilities. According to the sponsor, this change helps ensure defense dollars are focused on America's warfighters and military readiness, rather than overseas projects that blur the line between defense and foreign aid.
Support is the Limited Government Position because the Pentagon should not be used as a taxpayer-funded international aid agency, and Congress should prioritize defense spending for warfighting needs rather than mission creep. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4016 (Greene Amdt. 54)House 2025-20262x

Placing America First by Striking Defense Spending for HIV Prevention Education Programs in Foreign Countries

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #54 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 would strike funding in the bill for HIV prevention educational activities in foreign countries. It is noteworthy that the U.S., through other appropriation bills, provide roughly $6 billion annually to prevent and treat HIV-AIDS globally. According to the sponsor, such initiatives are best carried out through the countless charities and foundations improving health across the globe, not through funding directed towards national defense.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this measure keeps Pentagon appropriations focused on the military's core mission and helps limit the federal government's role in overseas social and public health programming. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4016 (Greene Amdt. 55)House 2025-20261x

Placing America First by Striking $500 Million for Israeli Cooperative Programs.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #55 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 would strike $500 million provided in the bill for the Israeli Cooperative Programs. This funding is on top of other assistance the U.S. annually provides to Israel, including $3.8 billion in foreign aid, the $8.7 billion provided in the April 2024 security supplemental, and the over $800 million in Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAD) missiles the U.S. used to defend the nuclear-armed Israel. According to the sponsor, Israel already provides universal health care and subsidized college for its citizens, and she argues Americans should not be asked to fund additional foreign programs while the United States is roughly $37 trillion in debt and Israel's national debt is under $400 billion.
Support is the Limited Government Position Support as while Israel is a key American ally, Americans simply cannot afford to fund a significant portion of its defense, especially when Israel has the resources to do so itself. Pentagon appropriations should be disciplined and focused on core U.S. defense responsibilities. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4016 (Greene Amdt. 56)House 2025-20261x

Placing America First by Striking $500 Million in Funding for Jordan's Military within the NDAA.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #56 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 would strike $500 million in funding in the bill that supports the Armed Forces of Jordan. According to the sponsor, this amendment is intended to ensure the Defense appropriations bill funds only America's military, not foreign militaries, especially when other legislation already provides substantial additional aid to Jordan, including $1.65 billion in the State and Foreign Operations funding bill released the same week of the vote.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this measure restrains foreign military spending and helps keep Pentagon appropriations focused on core U.S. defense needs. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4016 (Greene Amdt. 57)House 2025-20261x

Placing America First by Prohibiting Defense Appropriations within the NDAA from Being Used for Assistance to Ukraine

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) amendment #57 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 would prohibit funds made available by the act from being used for assistance to Ukraine. According to supporters, this prohibition is a needed guardrail to prevent another round of Ukraine funding from moving through Congress without clear limits, accountability, or a defined end point, especially as the national debt grows and needs at home remain unmet.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this measure restrains foreign spending and helps prevent Congress from writing open-ended commitments overseas. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4016 (Steube Amdt. 60)House 2025-20262x

Putting America First by Prohibiting Taxpayer-Funded Assistance to the Hezbollah-Tainted Lebanese Armed Forces.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) amendment #60 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 would prohibit any funds made available by the act from being used to provide assistance to the Lebanese Armed Forces. The amendment would ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars cannot be directed to a foreign military that has repeatedly operated alongside, or been infiltrated by, Hezbollah-linked elements and has been used as a lever of influence by hostile actors in the region. According to supporters, this is an America First guardrail to stop funding from flowing to a military force riddled with Hezbollah sympathizers that functions as another proxy for the Iranian terror regime.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this measure prevents wasteful foreign assistance and protects taxpayers by ensuring defense dollars serve U.S. interests rather than subsidizing questionable overseas forces.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 24)House 2025-20262x

Defunding the Delaware River Basin Commission and Ending the Ban on Hydraulic Fracturing.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #67 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would prohibit funding for the Delaware River Basin Commission and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. The Delaware River Basin Commission has used its authority to institute a ban on hydraulic fracturing within the basin. According to supporters, this is an example of an unelected regional body acting as a de facto energy regulator, overriding state and local priorities while restricting private property use and domestic energy production. By cutting off federal funding, the amendment is intended to dismantle support for the commission's fracking prohibition and restore decision-making to the states, local communities, and the lawful processes that should govern energy development.
Support is the Limited Government Position because Washington should not bankroll a regional bureaucracy that bans lawful energy production and undermines private enterprise. Defunding the commission restrains regulatory overreach, supports energy freedom, and returns authority to states and citizens.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 66)House 2025-20262x

Ending the Draconian Fracking Ban Imposed by the Delaware River Basin Commission.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #66 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would prohibit the use of funds for the Delaware River Basin Commission to implement or enforce the final rule entitled, "Comprehensive Plan and Special Regulations With Respect to High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing; Rules of Practice and Procedure Regarding Project Review Classifications and Fees." Effectively, this measure would terminate the ban on hydraulic fracking within the basin that the Commission had imposed. According to supporters, the Commission has acted as an unaccountable regional regulator by imposing a sweeping ban that blocks lawful domestic energy production, undermines state authority, and drives up costs for families and businesses. The amendment is intended to cut off the funding stream that enables enforcement and help unwind the Commission's anti-energy posture.
Support is the Limited Government Position because Washington should not bankroll an unelected regional body that bans lawful energy production and overrides state decision-making. Ending enforcement funding restrains regulatory overreach and supports affordable, reliable energy.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 68)House 2025-20261x

Defunding the Green New Deal Research Slush Fund Known as the ARPA-E and Returning the Money to Taxpayers

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #68 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would eliminate funding for the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. ARPA-E funds federal energy research and demonstration-style projects that often align with climate and "energy transition" agendas. According to supporters, the agency operates as a pipeline for Green New Deal-style initiatives by subsidizing politically driven technologies and steering private-sector innovation through federal grants rather than market demand.
Support is the Limited Government Position because the federal government should not fund industrial policy through energy grant-making agencies that promote climate activism and government-directed markets. Eliminating ARPA-E spending helps restrain Washington's reach and reduces wasteful subsidies. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 69)House 2025-20262x

Stopping the Enrichment of the Electric Vehicle Industry at Taxpayer Expense through the Defunding of the DOE's Vehicle Loan Program.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #69 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would eliminate funding for the Department of Energy's Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. According to the sponsor, this program "provides loans to companies that make Green New Deal cars" and has recklessly spent over $1 trillion, including $8 billion in subsidies on electric vehicle chargers. The amendment is intended to stop federal subsidies that prop up favored industries and to reduce the temptation for lobbying-driven deals that bypass normal market discipline.
Support is the Limited Government Position because the federal government should not pick winners and losers or use taxpayer-backed financing to subsidize private industry. Eliminating this program reduces corporate welfare and helps restrain federal spending. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 70)House 2025-20261x

Defunding a Crony Department of Energy Loan Program which has Enriched Chinese Companies at the Expense of American Taxpayers.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #70 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would eliminate $35 million in administrative funding for the Department of Energy's Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. According to the sponsor, the program reduces market discipline and has cost taxpayers many hundreds of millions, with some of the most egregious examples including Solyndra, Fisker Automotive and A123 Systems. The sponsor also noted that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was the ultimate beneficiary, as following the bankruptcies of Fisker and A123, the Chinese purchased the companies for pennies on the dollar.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this reckless loan program not only inflicts financial harm onto taxpayers, but has forced Americans to enrich the Chinese and provide the CCP with competitive advantages.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 71)House 2025-20262x

Cutting Funding for LGBTQ+ and Racial Minority Directed Grants via a Reduction in Appropriations to the Northern Border Commission

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #28 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would reduce funding for the Northern Border Regional Commission by $13,319,727 (returning the program to fiscal year 2019 levels) and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. The Northern Border Regional Commission's 2024 – 2029 strategic plan states its intention to "invest in projects that promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and increased accessibility" as its investment principle. Under the plan, the NBRC will also establish a committee that includes LGBTQ+ and minority groups to help the NBRC "maximize outreach and increase the utilization of NBRC funding".
Support is the Limited Government Position as the federal government should not fund DEI-style bureaucracy or direct grants based on identity politics through regional commissions. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 72)House 2025-20261x

Defunding Radical Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Initiatives via a Reduction in Appropriation to the Southwest Border Regional Commission.

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #72 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 would reduce funding for the Southwest Border Regional Commission – an entity heavily focused on advancing Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) – and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. According to the Commission's 2025 strategic plan, its central commitment will involve "equity" and will be "focusing on underserved populations, including low-income residents, communities of color, and rural areas". The plan includes various climate change initiatives and grants exclusively to minority-owned businesses.
Support is the Limited Government Position as the federal government should not fund race-based grantmaking, DEI bureaucracy, or green subsidy programs through regional commissions. Lawmakers must rein in the out-of-control spending and $38 trillion in national debt, which, when coupled with the $200 trillion in federal liabilities, represents the greatest existential threat facing this country.
H.R. 4553 (Perry Amd. 73)House 2025-20262x

Rolling Back the Ballooning Southeast Crescent Regional Commission and Stopping Electric Vehicle and Green Pork Spending

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) amendment #73 to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026, would reduce funding for the Southeast Crescent Regional Commission and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. The amendment would restore funding to pre-pandemic levels after the program's appropriation ballooned from an initial $250,000 to more than $16 million. According to supporters, this commission has drifted into politicized initiatives, including electric vehicle charging and green infrastructure, that are far outside core federal responsibilities. By scaling the program back and directing the savings to spending reduction, the amendment is intended to curb Washington's habit of turning small grants into permanent, expanding slush funds for regional pet projects.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should roll back bloated, nonessential spending and return regional development decisions to states and local communities. Restoring funding to pre-pandemic levels and shifting savings to deficit reduction helps restrain federal overreach and protect taxpayers.
H.R. 4776 (Clyde Amdt. 138)House 2025-20261x

Combatting Frivolous Litigation in the Federal Permitting Process by Clarifying the Term "Direct Harm".

Against
Limited
Government
The Andrew Clyde (R-GA) amendment #138 to the "SPEED Act" would clarify that "direct harm" does not include emotional, aesthetic, or recreational interests unless accompanied by a material physical or property harm. By narrowing what qualifies as "direct harm," this measure helps curb frivolous litigation deployed by activist groups that can delay lawful projects through years of process and paperwork, especially when the claimed injury is not tied to real-world physical impacts or property damage.
Support is the Limited Government Position as this measure helps curb frivolous litigation while making environmental review more predictable and disciplined, thus supporting faster private investment in infrastructure and energy production.
H.R. 4776 (Roy Amdt. 139)House 2025-20261x

Limiting NEPA Reviews so Federal Agencies Cannot Stall Permits by Analyzing Impacts They Have No Authority to Regulate

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) amendment #139 to the SPEED Act would revise the bill's scope-of-review clause to clarify that National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review applies only to environmental impacts that the lead agency or cooperating federal agencies have the legal authority to regulate. In practice, this change would narrow the universe of issues that can be forced into federal environmental reviews, keeping agencies focused on their actual statutory responsibilities. Without clear limits, NEPA can be used to justify endless studies, invite litigation, and delay energy and infrastructure projects even when the alleged "impacts" fall outside an agency's legal lane. According to supporters, this amendment helps stop bureaucratic mission creep and keeps permitting from becoming a backdoor weapon to block projects through paperwork and lawsuits.
Support is the Limited Government Position as it reins in regulatory overreach and helps prevent open-ended NEPA processes from being used to obstruct lawful development. It strengthens accountability by tying review back to an agency's actual legal authority.
H.R. 4776 (Roy Amdt. 140)House 2025-20261x

Narrowing NEPA's "Significant Impact" Standard to Stop Endless Environmental Impact Statements and Speed Permitting

Against
Limited
Government
The Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) amendment #140 to the SPEED Act would further define what counts as a "significant effect on the quality of the human environment" for purposes of triggering an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The amendment would define a "significant effect" as a proximate and concrete harm directly caused by the proposed agency action that materially impairs human health or property. It would also revise NEPA's EIS trigger so an EIS is required only when there is at least one such "significant effect," rather than the broader and more easily manipulated "significantly affecting" standard. According to supporters, tightening these definitions would reduce litigation gamesmanship and prevent agencies from dragging projects into years of paperwork over speculative or tangential claims.
Support is the Limited Government Position because it curbs bureaucratic discretion that enables open-ended permitting delays and keeps NEPA focused on concrete harms within a clear legal standard. It also helps restore predictable timelines so lawful projects are not blocked by endless process.
H.Con.Res. 58House 2025-20263x

Condemning Socialism and Defending Individual Liberty, Private Property, and Free Enterprise.

Neutral
The "Denouncing the horrors of socialism" concurrent resolution, sponsored by Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL), expresses the sense of Congress that socialism should be denounced in all its forms and that Congress opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States. The resolution lays out a series of findings describing the historic record of socialist and communist regimes, including famine, repression, and mass death, and it highlights how centralized economic control often collapses into authoritarian rule. It also underscores America's founding principles by citing the importance of property rights, personal liberty, and the freedom to enjoy the fruits of one's labor.
Support is the Limited Government Position as socialism requires centralized power that undermines personal freedom, private property, and voluntary exchange – the very antithesis of limited government.
H.J. RES. 104House 2025-20261x

Overturning a Biden Bureau of Land Management Plan that Prevents Coal Leasing on 1.7 Million Acres of Federal Land

Neutral
This resolution introduced by Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT) utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to nullify a Biden administration rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relating to the "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment." Resource management plans guide how BLM-administered lands are managed, including whether and where coal leasing may be considered. The Miles City plan amendment made 1.7 million acres unavailable for future coal leasing. According to supporters, this kind of federal land "lock up" undermines local economies and energy affordability by putting Washington planners ahead of workers, communities, and responsible development.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress must rein in unelected agencies that use sweeping land-use decisions to restrict lawful resource development and centralize control over local economies. This resolution helps restore accountability and protects access to America's domestic energy resources.
H.J. RES. 105House 2025-20261x

Overturning a Biden Bureau of Land Management Rule that Restricts Oil, Gas, and Coal Development on Federal Lands in North Dakota.

Neutral
This resolution introduced by Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to nullify a Biden administration rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relating to the "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan." Resource management plans guide how BLM-administered lands are managed, including where energy development is allowed or restricted. Biden's North Dakota plan modified the prior 1988 plan by limiting oil and gas development in certain areas and restricting new coal leasing to areas within four miles of existing mines. According to supporters, the rule represents a federal land-use "lock up" that would limit access to domestic resources, threaten jobs and state revenues, and increase energy costs for families and businesses.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress must rein-in unelected bureaucrats who use federal land plans to restrict lawful energy development and centrally plan the economy. This resolution helps protect energy affordability and strengthens American energy independence.
H.J. RES. 106House 2025-20261x

Overturning a Biden Bureau of Land Management Plan that Blocks Mineral Extraction on Millions of Acres in Alaska's Central Yukon Region.

Neutral
This resolution introduced by Rep. Nicholas Begich (R-AK) utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to nullify a Biden administration rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relating to the "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan." Resource management plans guide how BLM-administered lands are managed, including where uses such as responsible development, access, and conservation rules will apply. The Central Yukon plan was issued on November 12, 2024, and, among other changes, designates 21 areas as "critical environmental concern" and locks up roughly 3.6 million acres. According to supporters, these designations and related restrictions amount to a federal land "lock up" that can limit multiple-use access, hinder economic opportunity, and place Washington bureaucrats in charge of decisions that should be made closer to the people most affected.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress must rein in unelected federal agencies that use sweeping land-use plans to restrict lawful activity and centralize control over local economies. This resolution helps restore accountability and protects access to America's vast public-land resources.
H.J.Res. 117House 2025-20261x

Denying Congress the Ability to Fulfil its Constitutional Duty of Evaluating the Imposition of a 40% Tariff (Tax) on Imports from Brazil.

Neutral
This motion tables (defeats) a discharge petition sponsored by Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) that would allow Congress to debate and vote on the imposition of an additional 40% tariff on imports from Brazil. Specifically, the discharge petition would terminate the national emergency declared by President Trump on July 30, 2025, in Executive Order 14323, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act. President Trump's EO imposed an additional 40% tariff on Brazilian goods, which was on top of a 10% tariff the President imposed on Brazilian goods in April of 2025. Notably, on February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Learning Resources v. Trump that these emergency-tariff actions are unconstitutional.
Oppose is the Limited Government Position as the U.S. Constitution provides Congress – not the Executive Branch – the "power of the purse" to impose taxes and appropriate funds under Article 1, Section 9. Blocking the petition obstructs the ability of duly elected officials to fulfil their constitutional duty to manage the level of taxation (tariffs) being imposed on Americans.
H.J.Res. 130House 2025-20261x

Restoring American Energy and Jobs by Reversing the Biden-Era Plan that Shut Down Future Federal Coal Leasing.

Neutral
This resolution, sponsored by Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY), uses the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to nullify a former Biden administration rule implemented at the Bureau of Land Management titled "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment" on November 20, 2024. The Biden-era rule made no federal coal available for future leasing in the Buffalo Field Office area, effectively ending future federal coal leasing in Wyoming's Powder River Basin. By disapproving the 2024 rule, Congress would undo those restrictions and revert management back to the 2020 Trump-era plan, thus expanding the domestic energy supply.
Support is the Limited Government Position as the Biden-era decision locked up domestic resources and unnecessarily raised consumer costs. Nullifying this rule helps unleash American energy dominance and increases taxpayer revenues.
H.J.Res. 131House 2025-20261x

Repealing the Biden-Era ANWR Coastal Plain Leasing Restrictions to Restore Domestic Energy Production and Lower Costs.

Neutral
This resolution, sponsored by Rep. Nicholas Begich (R-AK), uses the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to nullify a former Biden administration rule implemented at the Bureau of Land Management titled "Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision" on December 9, 2024. The Biden-era rule changed how oil and gas leasing can occur in the Coastal Plain program area within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The Biden-era decision replaced the 2020 record of decision under the first Trump administration that had made the full 1.6 million acre program area available for leasing. The Biden-era decision made only 400,000 acres available for leasing (the statutory minimum) placing roughly 1.2 million acres off-limits.
Support is the Limited Government Position as the Biden-era decision locked up domestic resources and unnecessarily raised consumer costs. Nullifying this rule helps unleash American energy dominance and increases taxpayer revenues.
H.J.Res. 20House 2025-20261x

Repealing a Biden Rule at the Department of Energy that Effectively Bans Popular Natural Gas Tankless Water Heaters

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden Department of Energy rule titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters" and published on December 26, 2024. The underlying rule set new federal efficiency standards for gas-fired instantaneous (tankless) water heaters, including widely used non-condensing models. According to supporters, the rule was designed in a way that effectively pushes non-condensing units out of the market and forces homeowners and small businesses into more expensive options and complicated retrofits. They argue this is part of a broader regulatory playbook where Washington uses appliance rules to squeeze out natural gas products, shrinking consumer choice while raising costs for everyday replacements and home repairs.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should stop unelected regulators from using appliance standards as a backdoor ban that raises costs and limits consumer choice. Repealing this rule helps prevent federal bureaucrats from dictating what energy options Americans are allowed to use in their homes and businesses.
H.J.Res. 24House 2025-20261x

Blocking Biden's Costly Walk-In Cooler and Freezer Energy Standards Mandate by Overturning a Department of Energy Rule

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-OK), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden Department of Energy rule titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers" and published on December 23, 2024. The underlying rule establishes new federal energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers commonly used by grocery stores, restaurants, warehouses, and other commercial facilities. According to supporters, the repeal of the Biden rule would stop Washington from using one-size-fits-all efficiency mandates to dictate the design and purchase of essential refrigeration equipment. They argue these mandates drive up compliance and replacement costs, squeeze small businesses, and ultimately raise prices for consumers as businesses are forced to absorb yet another layer of federal micromanagement.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should rein in costly, top-down energy mandates imposed by unelected regulators. Repealing this rule helps protect small businesses and consumers from bureaucratic micromanagement that drives up prices.
H.J.Res. 25House 2025-20261x

Repealing a Biden IRS Rule that Grows Financial Surveillance Through Expanded Crypto "Broker" Reporting

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Mike Carey (R-OH), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal an Internal Revenue Service rule titled "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales" and published on December 30, 2024. The underlying rule expands who the IRS treats as a "broker" for digital asset sales and would require covered entities to report gross proceeds and send new tax statements tied to crypto transactions. According to supporters, repealing the Biden rule would stop Washington from rewriting the definition of "broker" to sweep in parts of the digital asset economy that do not operate like traditional brokerages, including technology platforms that cannot realistically collect the personal data the rule demands. They argue the Biden rule is less about honest tax administration and more about building a new reporting regime that turns financial innovation into a compliance trap, pushing lawful activity overseas while increasing the federal government's ability to monitor Americans' economic lives.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should stop the IRS from expanding surveillance-style reporting mandates that go beyond clear statutory authority and punish emerging technologies. Repealing this rule helps protect financial privacy and innovation from bureaucratic overreach.
H.J.Res. 35House 2025-20261x

Repealing Biden's EPA Methane Fee Rule That Grows Federal Penalties and Drives Up Domestic Energy Costs

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden Environmental Protection Agency rule titled "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions" and published on November 18, 2024. The underlying rule sets the compliance framework for the federal "waste emissions charge," including how covered facilities calculate emissions, use "netting," and qualify for exemptions, with EPA positioned to assess penalties when standards are not met. According to supporters, this rule is the enforcement engine for a Washington created methane tax that punishes American oil and gas production, increases compliance burdens across the supply chain, and ultimately raises energy prices for families and job creators. They argue it hands regulators another tool to pressure domestic producers while making the U.S. less competitive and more dependent on foreign energy.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should stop the federal government from using regulatory schemes and penalty regimes to tax and micromanage domestic energy production. Repealing this rule helps block bureaucratic enforcement that would raise costs and expand Washington's control over the energy economy.
H.J.Res. 42House 2025-20261x

Repealing a Biden Rule at the Department of Energy that Imposed Unnecessary Labeling and Certification Mandates on Consumer Appliances.

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden Department of Energy rule titled "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment" and published on October 9, 2024. The underlying rule imposed new federal paperwork, labeling, and reporting requirements and expanded enforcement provisions across a wide range of everyday appliances and equipment. It covered roughly 20 product categories, reaching into items like dishwashers, clothes washers, air conditioners and heat pumps, battery chargers, light bulbs, and other common products used by families and employers. According to supporters, by nullifying the rule, the resolution would stop Washington from turning routine appliances into a compliance headache where manufacturers face more audits, more forms, and more threats of enforcement, and then pass those costs along to everyone at the checkout counter.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should rein-in unelected regulators that keep adding paperwork mandates and enforcement traps that raise prices and restrict consumer choice. Repealing this rule helps protect businesses from another round of bureaucratic micromanagement.
H.J.Res. 60House 2025-20261x

Overturning a Draconian Biden Rule that Banned Off-Road Vehicle Usage on Miles of Trails at Glen Canyon National Park

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden National Park Service rule titled "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles" and published on January 13, 2025. The underlying rule revised special regulations for Glen Canyon to update and restrict where motor vehicles may be used on roads and off-road on designated routes and areas. According to supporters, the rule empowers federal land managers to tighten access through regulatory changes that can limit recreation, local use, and tourism-dependent communities while expanding Washington's control over how Americans can use public lands. They argue Congress should stop this kind of federal overreach and keep access decisions from being driven by bureaucracy and pressure from activist groups rather than transparent, accountable policymaking.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should rein in agencies that use regulation to micromanage public-land access without accountability. Repealing this rule helps prevent federal managers from steadily restricting lawful use of public lands through top-down mandates.
H.J.Res. 61House 2025-20261x

Repealing a Biden EPA Rule that Imposed Costly New Emissions Mandates on U.S. Tire Manufactures.

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden Environmental Protection Agency rule titled "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing" and published on November 29, 2024. The underlying rule imposed new federal emissions standards on parts of the rubber tire manufacturing process and expanded EPA's regulatory reach over domestic tire plants. According to supporters, repealing the Biden rule would stop Washington from piling more red tape and expensive compliance demands onto an industry that supports thousands of American jobs and produces an essential product used by nearly every household and business. They argue the mandate would raise production costs, squeeze smaller facilities the hardest, and push more manufacturing out of the United States.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should block unaccountable bureaucrats from imposing costly mandates that punish domestic manufacturing through backdoor rulemaking. Repealing this EPA action helps protect jobs, affordability, and U.S. competitiveness by reining in regulatory overreach.
H.J.Res. 75House 2025-20261x

Blocking Biden's Costly Commercial Refrigeration Energy Standards Mandate by Overturning a Department of Energy Rule

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by Rep. Craig Goldman (R-TX), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden Department of Energy rule titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator-Freezers" and published on January 21, 2025. The underlying rule establishes new federal energy conservation standards for common commercial refrigeration equipment used by grocery stores, restaurants, convenience stores, and other businesses. According to supporters, the repeal of the Biden rule would stop Washington from using one-size-fits-all efficiency mandates to dictate what equipment businesses can buy and how much it must cost to comply. These types of federal standards often function as a hidden tax on everyday commerce by forcing expensive redesigns, accelerating replacement cycles, and raising operating and purchase costs that ultimately get passed on to consumers.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should rein-in costly, top-down energy mandates imposed by unelected regulators. Repealing this rule helps protect small businesses and consumers from bureaucratic micromanagement that drives up prices.
H.J.Res. 78House 2025-20262x

Reversing a Biden Endangered Listing to Protect California Water Supplies and Stop Federal Overreach

Neutral
This joint resolution, introduced by the late Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA), would utilize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a Biden U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule titled "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt" and published on July 30, 2024. The underlying rule lists the San Francisco Bay-Delta distinct population segment of the longfin smelt as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. According to opponents of the Biden rule, the listing empowers federal regulators and environmental litigators to tighten water-use restrictions in the Bay-Delta and jeopardize water deliveries that families, farmers, and communities rely on, even as California already faces chronic water-management and infrastructure challenges.
Support is the Limited Government Position as Congress should rein-in agency overreach that uses the Endangered Species Act to drive sweeping water policy without accountability. Repealing this rule helps prevent Washington from using an endangered listing to restrict livelihoods and centralize control over essential resources.
Loading more bills…

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rep. Stacey Plaskett's voting record?

Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-US-At-Large) is tracked on the Institute for Legislative Analysis legislative scorecard. Highest category scores: Local and National Security (50%), Energy and Environment (10%), and Tax and Fiscal (0%). Stacey Plaskett represents Congress's At-Large Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Where does Stacey Plaskett serve?

Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-US-At-Large) represents Congress's At-Large Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat.

What issue categories does Stacey Plaskett score highest and lowest on?

Stacey Plaskett's strongest categories on the Institute for Legislative Analysis scorecard are Local and National Security (50%) and Energy and Environment (10%). The lowest-scoring categories are Law and Scope of Government (0%) and Regulations (0%).

Institute for Legislative Analysis logo

Let's build a platform together!

Quick Links

Resources

  • Data Sources
  • Report Correction
© 2023 - 2026 Institute for Legislative Analysis. All Rights Reserved.
Open Options